Pelvic prolapse - as one of the manifestations of ventral hernia, the benefits of laparoscopic access
| dc.contributor.author | Strakhovetsky, V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shchedrov, Andrey | |
| dc.contributor.author | Veligotsky, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Teslenko, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goncharova, Natalya | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-10T08:42:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-12-10T08:42:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The different treatments of pelvic hernia or pelvic prolapse were analyzed. 83 patients with pelvic prolapse were treated. The 1st group – 43 patients with pelvic hernia who were under laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy with mesh; 2nd group – 40 patients with pelvic prolapse who were under the different pelvic surgery. During the research found that laparoscopy is better and more physiological looking on the fact that pelvic hernia starts from abdominal cavity and, so, should be corrected from abdominal cavity. It was proved by results – in the 1st group the relapse was just once, but in the 2 nd group it happened in 15 %, there were not mesh – associated complications in the 1st group, but in the 2nd group there were from 7 to 20 % of them. | ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pelvic prolapse – as one of the manifestations of ventral hernia, the benefits of laparoscopic access / V. S. Strakhovetsky, A. O. Shchedrov, O. M. Veligotsky, S. M. Teslenko, N. M. Goncharova // Science Review. – 2018. – N 1 (8), Vol. 3. – P. 13–15. | ru_RU |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repo.knmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/21743 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | ru_RU |
| dc.subject | pelvic hernia (pelvic prolapse) | ru_RU |
| dc.subject | laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy | ru_RU |
| dc.subject | mesh-associated complications | ru_RU |
| dc.subject | pelvic hernia relapse | ru_RU |
| dc.title | Pelvic prolapse - as one of the manifestations of ventral hernia, the benefits of laparoscopic access | ru_RU |
| dc.type | Article | ru_RU |